Account Navigation

Account Navigation

Currency - All prices are in AUD

Currency - All prices are in AUD
 Loading... Please wait...
Autism Coach

CDC Study Proves Vaccines Harm and Kill

Posted by on

Here is a link to a new 2015 study by CDC researchers proving that vaccines harm and kill. This study concludes that the HIB vaccine often given to children 4 times during infancy is linked to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Between 1990 and 2013 there were 29,000 reports of adverse effects and 749 deaths. This vaccine is believed by many to also be one of the triggers for autism.  Another study found that  infant boys immunized with HIB at birth are three times more likely to develop an autism spectrum disorder.  

Here is a link to the abstract for the CDC's publication, funny this taxpayer funded study isn't available for free through the taxpayer funded site,

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is the 3rd leading cause of death in infants, and because the U.S. has one of the highest rates of infant mortality in the developed world, one would think that more progress would have been made toward understanding its causes. Perhaps, the signal of harm is being ignored. Neglect and suppression of available data has recently been exposed with the confession of a top CDC vaccine scientist who was compelled to covered up data revealing an autism-MMR link in African American boys.   

The HiB vaccine is described on the CDC website as “very safe” and “effective” at preventing HiB disease, which it states can be deadly. They list “most common side effects as usually mild and last 2 or 3 days,” including “redness, swelling, and warmth where the child got the shot” and “fever”. Nowhere is there listed death or disability as a possible side effect.

In the new study, the CDC and FDA researchers themselves acknowledge “the scarcity” of postlicensure safety data on HiB vaccines in today’s vaccination schedule. They evaluated reports involving the currently licensed Hib vaccines received from January 1, 1990, through December 1, 2013 available on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Presently, the CDC recommends 4 doses of the HiB vaccine at the following ages: 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 12 months through 15 months.

In stark contrast to these statements the study uncovered the following highly concerning results:

VAERS received 29,747 reports after Hib vaccines; 5179 (17%) were serious, including 896 reports of deaths. Median age was 6 months (range 0-10.22 months). Sudden infant death syndrome was the stated cause of death in 384 (51%) of 749 death reports with autopsy/death certificate records. The most common nondeath serious AE categories were neurologic (80; 37%), other noninfectious (46; 22%) (comprising mainly constitutional signs and symptoms); and gastrointestinal (39; 18%) conditions. No new safety concerns were identified after clinical review of reports of AEs that exceeded the data mining statistical threshold.

Consider also that VAERS is a passive surveillance system, which suffers from profound underreporting. According to the VAERS site’s own disclaimer:

“Underreporting” is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report.

According to Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccination Information Center, underreporting may result in overlooking 99% or higher of all vaccine associated injuries:

“Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler estimated in a 1993 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association that fewer than 1 percent of all doctors report injuries and deaths following the administration of prescription drugs. This estimate may be even lower for vaccines. In one survey that our organization conducted in New York in 1994, only 1 doctor in 40 reported to VAERS.”

Considering the influence of underreporting, these deaths represent only the tip of the iceberg of vaccine-induced infant morbidity and mortality caused by HiB vaccines. The study also mentioned an earlier analysis which found that infant death is the most common cause of death reported by all vaccine linked reports on VAERS, “accounting for almost one-half of all deaths reported.”

Obviously, this is an appalling study. The death of even 1 child for a potentially ineffective medical intervention designed to prevent a rarely fatal illness is a tragedy. Nor can any single vaccine be proven to have prevented any single case of disease because the clinical outcome (end point) is a non-event. This is not the case, however, for vaccine side effects which can be linked directly to the vaccination event with plausible scientific mechanisms.

What is perhaps most astounding is the researcher’s conclusion:

“Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns for Hib vaccines.”

This callous disregard for the evidence — evidence that clearly shows the CDC misrepresents the safety of the HiB vaccine — speaks to the blind investment in vaccine policy decisions over human wellbeing. Millions of parents have listened to the CDC and FDA and believed that these vaccines not only work but are safe. Informed consent requires those undergoing a quasi-mandatory medical intervention like vaccination to know the true risks associated with it. Failing to do so is clearly a violation of this medical ethical protection against being abused, and in some cases disabled and even killed.

The United States' aggressive and lucrative vaccine policies, that are now manifesting in trial balloons of articles threatening to sue parents who choose not to vaccinate are setting a dangerous precedent for nullifying basic civil liberties and constitutional rights.  It statistically appears as if many of these vaccines are injuring far more children than they help, in violation of the part of the Hippocratic Oath which physicians take, summarized as "First, do no harm."  There is a huge gap between research on safety of medical practices, vaccines and drugs and how this knowledge is implemented in public policy through government organizations.

Perhaps the Hippocratic Oath should be updated and retitled as the Hypocritic Oath:   "First make money to pay back student debts, then have your professional organization work to bury statistics and studies with findings linking medical practices, vaccines, and pharmaceutical drugs to injury, disability and death, and finally lobby for a health care system that creates a lucrative health care monopoly that excludes and seeks to shut down more effective, affordable, natural and preventive health care options, and make money by making the population sick through harmful medical practices and then makes even more money by treating conditions created by these same harmful medical practices."  

The insurance companies pharmaceutical companies and the mainstream medical guild, the AMA, are raking it in under the new repressive, rate-hiking, and restrictive Obama Care policies as the average person is subjected to a health tax without representation to subsidize the manufacture and distribution overpriced unsafe prescription drugs, unsafe medical procedures exemplified in the anesthetics and pitocin drips used  as the typical hospital birth (that are also linked to triggering autism), and vaccines which have been proven unsafe.  Doctors often aren't even allowed or encouraged to think; they are brainwashed in medical school to prescribe and follow rote instructions on how to handle situations and use drugs dictated by pharmaceutical companies rather than take time and thoughtfully investigate health issues in a less profitable fashion that would get to the root cause of health issues and lead to effective diagnosis, treatment, prevention and curing of disease.  The 15-minute visit patient model doesn't work.

Our tax dollars and health care tax dollars are subsidizing a bloated, corrupt and ineffective system that is draining our economy, standard of living, and quality of life. My own family spends about 25% of our gross income on health insurance with high deductibles and medical expenses that the insurance doesn't cover.

If you are a physician and have trouble living with yourself, you can always self-medicate; physician prescribe thyself; doctors have the amongst the highest rates of substance abuse of any profession.

comments powered by Disqus