Double-Blind,
Placebo-Controlled Study of l-Carnosine
Supplementation in Children With Autistic Spectrum Disorders
Michael
G. Chez, MD; Cathleen P. Buchanan, PhD; Mary C. Aimonovitch;
Marina Becker, RN; Karla Schaefer, RN; Carter Black, RPh; Jamie Komen,
MA
ABSTRACT
l-Carnosine,
a dipeptide, can enhance frontal lobe function or be neuroprotective.
It can also correlate with g-aminobutyric
acid (GABA)-homocarnosine interaction, with possible anticonvulsive
effects. We investigated 31
children with autistic spectrum disorders in an 8-week, double-blinded
study to determine if 800 mg l-carnosine
daily would result in observable changes versus placebo.
Outcome measures were the Childhood Autism Rating Scale, the
Gilliam Autism Rating Scale, the Expressive and Receptive One-Word
Picture Vocabulary tests, and Clinical Global Impressions of Change.
Children on placebo did not show statistically significant
changes. After 8 weeks on
l-carnosine,
children showed statistically significant improvements on the Gilliam
Autism Rating Scale (total score and the Behavior, Socialization, and
Communication subscales) and the Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary
test (all P<.05). Improved
trends were noted on other outcome measures.
Although the mechanism of action of l-carnosine
is not well understood, it may enhance neurologic function, perhaps in
the enterorhinal or temporal cortex. (J
Child Neurol 2002;17:833-837).
Autistic
spectrum disorders (autistic disorder, pervasive developmental delay not
otherwise specified, and Asperger’s syndrome) are long-term,
developmental disorders with no known or agreed on nervous system
pathology or definitive genetic site.1,2
Unfortunately, very few double-blind studies have been performed
involving autistic spectrum-disorders, owing to the different degrees of
presentation and the multiple phenotypes of the disease.
The varying symptoms observed with the autistic spectrum disorder
syndrome indicate more than a single region of injury that results in
an assortment of behaviors.1
With no available cure, treatment is contained to
modifying the course of the disease.
Research
in the past several years has shown an association between sleep
electroencephalograms (EEGs) and autism.3-7
One third of autistic children suffer one or more seizures by
adolescence, perhaps linking epileptiform activity with some instances
of autistic spectrum disorders.5
Magnetoencephalographic data have suggested that the percentage
may even be higher; in a recent autistic study, 14% more children were
identified as having epileptiform activity by magnetoencephalography
(82%) who were not identified by concurrent EEG (68%).5
Valproic
acid, an anticonvulsant effective in treating seizure disorders, is
hypothesized to increase g-aminobutyric
acid (GABA) concentrations within the central nervous system.8, 9
GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the cerebral
cortex.10,11 Positive
results have been observed in administration of valproic acid to
autistic patients, especially in patients with EEG abnormalities.12-16
Anticonvulsants have also been successful in psychiatric disease
use, particularly bipolar disorder.
Recent
work by Petroff and his colleagues at Yale University has demonstrated
that GABA activity can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging
spectroscopy with a higher field strength.17
Although Petroff and colleagues studied cases of generalized
myoclonic epilepsies, his finding is significant because of the
correlation established between levels of GABA and homocarnosine levels.
Even in cases of low GABA function, homocarnosine levels can
correlate with better seizure control.
Other investigators have reported elevated homocarnosine
levels in infants with epilepsy or brain injury.18
Cases of temporal lobe or generalized seizures have also shown
seizure control to correlate with homocarnosine levels.17
Homocarnosine
is formed when GABA and carnosine bind.
Carnosine appears to modulate copper and zinc influx into cells
and near GABA receptors, thereby affecting potential epileptic
inhibition. Further,
modulation of zinc and copper can have complementary antiepileptiform
effects in the hippocampus and frontal lobe,19 as well as
being neuroprotective against ischemia.20, 21
Carnosine can offer anticonvulsant protection in vitro and in
rats in prior studies, perhaps by altering homocarnosine levels or by a
direct chelating effect on zinc at GABA receptor sites.22
Because carnosine has been described as accumulating in the
enterorhinal subfrontal cortex, we hypothesize that it might act in a
protective or activating role for the frontal lobe.
Dysfunction of the frontal lobe is hypothesized to be linked to
expression and behavior; both areas characteristically impaired in
autistic spectrum disorders.23-25
We
therefore designed a study to target some of the purported brain regions
of dysfunction in autistic spectrum disorders via supplementation with a
naturally occurring amino acid that is believed to act on frontal lobe
systems or GABA receptors. We
sought to eliminate the “expectancy effect” of medication
augmentation by enrolling children in study so that both the clinicians
and the parents were blind to group assignment.
METHODS
Children were included for study if they met the following criteria: age
3-12 years and prior diagnoses of autistic spectrum disorder (including
either pervasive developmental disorder or autistic disorder; by the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders –IV-Revised).26
Thirteen subjects had a current abnormal EEG, and 13 were being
maintained on valproic acid. Children
were excluded if they had a family history of seizure disorder, fragile
X syndrome, or other genetic disorder or etiology of their spectrum
disorder. Children were
enrolled in the study irrespective of cognitive ability level.
All children were tested at baseline in the following domains:
expressive language (Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary test),
receptive language (Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary test), autism
severity ratings (Childhood Autism Rating Scale and Gilliam Autism
Rating Scale), and Clinical Global Impressions of Change, which were
completed by the parents. At baseline and 8-week testing, all children
underwent the Childhood Autism Rating Scale, the Gilliam Autism Rating
Scale, the Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary test, the Receptive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test, and the Clinical Global Impression of
Change. Children were
tested with their parents in a pediatric neurology clinic in a room
dedicated to assessment. The
parents signed informed written consent (approved by the Lake Forest
Hospital Institutional Review Board) before being randomly assigned to
either active-agent or placebo, and reporting of adverse events was
explained per office emergency policy.
Parents, clinicians, and neurologists were all blinded to placebo
versus active carnosine. At
the completion of the study, the blind code was broken by identifying
the patient’s bottle number with the placebo or carnosine
administration.
Because
of our prior experience with the substance in an open label format, we
were able to caution regarding the following potential adverse events:
hyperactivity and excitability. Both
placebo and active substances were identical
in powdered appearance, without taste or smell.
All pills were contained by a gelatin capsule; parents were
instructed to mix the powder with either food or drink.
Dosage of carnosine was 400 mg by mouth twice daily.
Every
2 weeks, parents faxed a Clinical Global Impression of Change regarding
their child. The Clinical
Global Impression was a 5-point rating scale covering the following
domains: (1)socialization, interaction with others during play;
(2)spontaneous, expressive language or vocal- izations;
(3)attention span, “focus”/eye contact, alertness level;
(4)agitation and hyperactivity or lethargy, energy level;
(5)coordination, body use, gross motor movements; and (6)anxiety,
rigidity, perseveration, adaptation to change.
A score of 0 indicated “no change,” and a score of 5
indicated a “great improvement”
Parents were not allowed to refer back to faxes from the prior
2-week period, so that each rating was essentially “blinded” to the
week before. An overall
baseline Clinical Global Impression was then compared with an ending
Clinical Global Impression.
Statistical
analyses included descriptive statistics and comparisons of baseline and
ending means. Pairwise
t-tests were conducted with
Turkey
’s correction for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS
Thirty-one
children (21 males, 10 females, mean age=7.45; range 3.2-12.5) meeting
inclusion criteria were enrolled in an 8-week, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study. Children
were entered randomly into one of two groups: group 1(n=17)
received a placebo for the first 8 weeks, whereas group 2(n=14)
received the active substance. Children
were assessed at baseline in the domains show in Table 1.
There
were no statistically significant differences in any of the baseline
measures with the exception of the Communication subscale of the Gilliam
Autism Rating Scale. Although
the group on the active substance started out with a higher level on the
Communication scale, there were no statistically significant differences
when tested on the objective language measures, the Receptive One-Word
Picture Vocabulary test and the Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary
test. Being medicated with
valproic acid or having a current abnormal EEG did not make a difference
in terms of group differences.
Table
1. Baseline
Measures for Children in Blinded Carnosine Study
Baseline
8 Weeks
Measure
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Significance
| Age
(mo) |
92.47
(28.95) |
85.69
(24.57) |
.NS |
| Clinical
Global Impression |
12.94
(4.18) |
14.50
(3.65) |
NS |
| Expressive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (raw) |
30.65
(26.28) |
35.36
(20.87) |
NS |
| Expressive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (age adjusted) |
35.41
(29.94) |
40.71
(23.44) |
NS |
| Receptive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (raw) |
34.29
(28.56) |
38.00
(23.67) |
NS |
| Receptive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary (age adjusted) |
29.65
(27.91) |
40.57
(24.55) |
NS |
| Childhood
Autism Rating Scale |
34.85
(6.69) |
31.71
(6.55) |
NS |
| Gilliam
Autism Rating Scale |
50.88
(16.96) |
55.50
(16.35) |
NS |
|
Behavior Scale |
17.17
(8.71) |
15.71
(6.65) |
NS |
|
Socialization Scale |
18.47
(6.40) |
18.14
(6.30) |
NS |
|
Communication Scale |
15.23
(6.68) |
21.64
(7.99) |
NS |
NS = not significant
After 8
weeks, children returned for repeat testing.
The scores for the follow-up test appear in Table 2.
As may be seen form Table 2, any changes that occurred within the
placebo group did not result in any statistically significant changes
after 8 wee
ks.
Table
2.
Changes in Children after 8 Weeks on Placebo
Baseline
8 Weeks
Measure
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Significance
| Clinical
Global Impression (baseline vs. 8 wk) |
12.94
(4.18) |
14.25
(4.51) |
.NS |
| Clinical
Global Impression (2 wk vs 6 wk |
4.82
(5.30) |
4.71
(5.02) |
NS |
| Expressive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (raw) |
30.65
(26.28) |
31.65
(29.19) |
NS |
| Expressive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (age adjusted) |
35.41
(29.94) |
37.12
(33.38) |
NS |
| Receptive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (raw) |
34.29
(28.56) |
37.11
(30.89 |
NS |
| Receptive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary (age adjusted) |
39.65
(27.91) |
41.65
(30.46) |
NS |
| Childhood
Autism Rating Scale |
34.85
(6.69) |
33.76
(6.54) |
NS |
| Gilliam
Autism Rating Scale |
50.88
(16.96) |
49.88
(16.80) |
NS |
|
Behavior Scale |
17.17
(8.71) |
15.82
(7.74) |
NS |
|
Socialization Scale |
18.47 (6.40) |
17.18
(7.76) |
NS |
|
Communication Scale |
15.23
(6.68) |
16.88
(6.48) |
NS |
It
is important from examination of Table 3 that there were significant
changes across several measures in multiple domains for those children
who were given the carnosine for 8 weeks.
Significant improvements with carnosine
compared with the placebo were seen in the 2-week versus 6-week faxed
Clinical Global Impression ratings (P =.04), Receptive One-Word
Picture Vocabulary test scores (P =.01), and Gilliam Autism
Rating Scale scores (P =.01), including the Behavior (P
=.04), Socialization (P =.01). and
Communication (P =.03) subscales.
The baseline to 8-week Clinical Global Impression and Childhood
Autism Rating scale testing measures also showed improving trends,
although not statistically significant (P =.06, P =.07,
respectively). Pairwise
t-tests performed on the placebo group showed that there were no
significant changes on any of the measures after 8 weeks on the inert
pills with a confidence level of P<.05.
Table
3.
Changes in Children after 8 Weeks on Active Carnosine
Baseline
8 Weeks
Measure
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Significance
| Clinical
Global Impression (baseline vs. 8 wk) |
14.50
(3.65) |
16.39
(4.36) |
.06 |
| Clinical
Global Impression (2 wk vs 6 wk |
2.03
(2.24) |
4.92
(5.69) |
.04 |
| Expressive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (raw) |
35.36
(20.87) |
37.28
(25.66) |
NS |
| Expressive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (age adjusted) |
40.71
(23.44) |
43.78
(28.22) |
NS |
| Receptive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary test (raw) |
38.00
(23.68) |
44.64 (26.56) |
.01 |
| Receptive
One-Word Picture Vocabulary (age adjusted) |
40.57 (24.55) |
47.86 (28.37) |
.01 |
| Childhood
Autism Rating Scale |
31.71
(6.55) |
29.75
(7.53) |
.07 |
| Gilliam
Autism Rating Scale |
55.50
(16.35) |
44.35
(14.93) |
.01 |
|
Behavior Scale |
15.71
(6.65) |
12.86 (5.95) |
.04 |
|
Socialization Scale |
21.64
(7.99) |
18.14
(6.27) |
.03 |
|
Communication Scale |
18.14
(6.30) |
13.36
(6.58) |
01 |
NS
= not significant.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study suggest that supplementation with carnosine
can significantly improve receptive speech, socialization, and behavior
with autistic spectrum disorders.
These gains are observable both by parents and clinicians blinded
to study group, as evidenced by the scores on the Clinical Global
Impression. Although not
statistically significant, improved trends in extreme speech, baseline
versus 8-week Clinical Global Impression ratings, and the Childhood
Autism Rating Scale scores were noted, correlating with subjective
reports of improvement by parents to the neurologists.
The extra data points of the Clinical Global Impression between
weeks 2 and 6 do reach significance, further supporting overt clinical
observation. Moreover,
improvements on objective standardized rating scores such as the
Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary test, tests for which practice
effects are not of concern to reliability,
also validate these observations. Several
patients had individually noticeable expressive speech improvement on
the Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary test, but, as a group, only a
trend was obtained. This
was because of some individuals who, owing to the heterogeneous
nature of autistic spectrum disorders, had very low scores
at baseline.
Not a single child had to discontinue
the study because of side effects.
Parents reported only sporadic hyperactivity, which was
alleviated by decreasing the dose.
Previous studies involving carnosine
have indicated a very low toxicity level; among 691 cases of adult
clinical trials, no symptomatic side effects were reported.27
The
mechanism of action of carnosine is not well understood.
Carnosine is recognized for its antioxidant20, 28-30
and proton buffer20, 28, 31 properties, protection against
oxidative stress, and resistance toward senescence.30, 32-35
More significantly, it will complex with endogenous transitional
metals of biological significance.19, 27, 36-38
Zinc and copper have been found in pools in brain regions
(hippocampus, locus ceruleus, hypothalamus, olfactory bulb, and cortex)
at concentrations that allow them to exert neuromodulator effects.19
Although these transition metals are required for normal
functioning in the nervous system, they have also been found to be
neurotoxic.19, 37 Shifts
in zinc and copper may be involved in the neuropathology of
Alzheimer’s disease, ischemic stroke, and seizures.37
Further, zinc and copper have been shown to suppress GABA-mediated
inhibitory synaptic transmission. Petroff
and colleagues’ work has shown a critical relationship between
homocarnosine and GABA acid levels in epilepsy control.17
Carnosine can also prevent the influx of copper and zinc and
enhance GABA function.37
A majority of our subset of children
with autistic spectrum disorders were those who had a positive history
of abnormal EEG or partial response to valproic acid therapy.
If, indeed, carnosine acts to affect GABA bioavailability, it may
likely alter the subclinical seizure threshold or GABA function.
Carnosine is the first dietary supplement that may alter the
neuronal function in children with autistic-spectrum disorders that can
be attributed in a double-blind controlled fashion.
Further study is needed to investigate the mechanism of carnosine
supplementation on brain biochemistry.
Our observations regarding the autistic spectrum population
suggest improved receptive speech and improved social attention, less
apraxia, and overall global improvements.
References
HOME
to
order
1.
Rodier PM, Ingram JL, Tisdale
B, et al: Embryological origin for autism: Developmental anomalies of
the cranial nerve motor nuclei. J
Comp Neurol 1996; 370: 247-261.
2.
Bachevalier J: Medial
temporal lobe structures and autism: A review of the clinical and
experimental findings. Neuropsychology
1994; 32: 627-348.
3.
Tuchman
RF, Jayakar P, Yaylali I, Villalobos R: Seizures and EEG findings
in children with autism spectrum disorder.
CNS Spectrums 1998; 3:61-70.
4.
Deykin EY, MacMahon B: The
incidence of seizures among children with autistic symptoms.
Am J Psychiatry 1979; 136:1310-1312.
5.
Lewine JD, Andrews R., Chez
MG, et al: Magnetoencephalographic patterns of epileptiform activity in
children with regressive autism spectrum disorders.
Pediatrics 1999; 104: 405-418.
6.
Tuchman RF, Rapin I:
Regression in pervasive developmental disorders: Seizures and
epileptiform electroencephalogram correlates.
Pediatrics 1991; 99: 560-566.
7.
Tuchman RF, Rapin I, Shinnar
S: Autistic and dysphasic children.
II: Epilepsy. Pediatrics
1991; 88: 1219-1225.
8.
Borowitz SM: Valproic acid in
the treatment of pediatric seizures.
Pediatr Pharmacother 1997; 3:423-430.
9.
Bennett GJ, Dworkin RH,
Nicholson B: Anticonvulsant therapy in the treatment of neuropathic
pain. Continuing Medical
Education 2000; 14: 338-352.
10.
Bradford
HF: Glutamate, GABA, and epilepsy.
Prog Neurobiol 1995; 47: 477-511.
11.
Meldrum BS: Epilepsy and
gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibition.
Int Rev Neurobiol 1975; 17: 1-36.
12.
Chez MG, Buchanan CP,
Field-Chez M, et al: Treatment of electroencephalographic epileptiform
activity on overnight EEG studies in children with pervasive
developmental delay or autism: Defining similarities to the Landau-Kleffner
syndrome. J Dev Learn
Disord 1998; 2: 217-229.
13.
Helfand BT, Chez MG,
Bardenstein R, et al: Improvement in EEG and clinical function in
pervasive developmental delay (PDD): Pharmacological effects of
monotherapy and combination therapy using valproic acid and predinisone,
abstract. Epilepsia
1998; 39.
14.
Chez MG, Loeffel M, Buchanan
CP, Field-Chez M: Pulse high dose steroids as combination therapy with
valproic acid in epileptic aphasia patients with pervasive developmental
delay or autism. Ann
Neurol 1998; 44: 539.
15.
Plioplys AV: Autism:
Electroencephalogram abnormalities and clinical improvement with
valproic acid. Arch
Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994; 148: 220-222.
16.
Hollander E, Dolgoff-Daspar
R, Cartwright C, et al: An open trial of divalproex sodium in autism
spectrum disorders. J
Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62: 530-534.
17.
Petoff OAC, Hyder F, Rothman
DL, Mattson RH: Homocarnosine and seizure control in juvenile myoclonic
epilepsy and complex partial seizures.
Neurology 2001; 56: 709-715.
18.
Takahashi H: Studies on
homocarnosine in cerebrospinal fluid in infancy and childhood.
Part II. Homocarnosine
levels in cerebrospinal fluid from children with epilepsy, febrile
convulsion or meningitis. Brain
Dev 1981; 3: 263-270.
19.
Trombly
PQ
, Horning MS, Blakemore LJ: Interactions
between carnosine and zinc and copper: Implications for neuromodulation
and neuroprotection. Biochemistry
2000; 65: 949-960.
20.
Stvolinsky SL, Dobrota D:
Anti-ischemic activity of carnosine.
Biochemistry 2000; 65: 849-855.
1.
Stvolinsky SL, Kukley M,
Dobrota D, et al: Carnosine protects rats under global ischemia.
Brain Res Bull 2000; 53: 445-448.
2.
Ozonoff S, Pennigton BF,
Rogers SJ: Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic
individuals: Relationship to theory of mind.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1991; 32: 1081-1103.
3.
Oznoff S, Strayer D, McMahon
W, et al: Executive function abilities in autism and Tourette’s
syndrome: An information processing approach.
J Chid Psychol Psychiatry 1994; 35: 1015-1032.
4.
Trombly
PQ
, Horning MS, Blakemore LJ: Carnosine
modulates zinc and copper effects on amino acid receptors and synaptic
transmission. Neuroreport
1998; 9: 3503-3507.
5.
Bauman ML, Kemper TL:
Histoanatomic observations of the brain in early infantile autism.
Neurology 1985; 35: 866-874.
6.
American Psychiatric
Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
4th ed.
Washington
,
DC
, American Psychiatric Association, 1993.
7.
Matsukura T, Tnaka H:
Applicability of zinc complex of l–Carnosine
for medical use. Biochemistry
2000; 65: 817-823.
8.
Holliday R,
McFarland
GA
: A role for carnosine in cellular
maintenance. Biochemistry
2000; 65: 843-848.
9.
Boldyrev AA: Problems and
perspectives in studying the biological role of carnosine. Biochemistry
2000; 65: 751-756.
10.
Sturenburg HJ: The roles of
carnosine in aging of skeletal muscle and in neuromuscular diseases.
Biochemistry 2000; 65: 862-865.
11.
Abe H: Role of hisidine-related
compounds as intracellular proton buffering constituents in vertebrate
muscle. Biochemistry 2000;
65: 771-778.
12.
Hipkiss
AR
: Carnosine and protein carbonyl groups: A
possible relationship. Biochemistry
2000; 65: 771-778.
13.
Hipkiss
AR
, Brownson C: A possible new role for the
anti-ageing peptide carnosine. Cell
Mol Life Sci 2000; 57: 747-753.